Allahabad High Court

CRLP/5317/2025 of ANKISH TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS on 4 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5317 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Syed Ali Murtaza, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Vishal, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Raza Abbas, learned counsel for the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5317 of 2025

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Syed Ali Murtaza, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Vishal, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Raza Abbas, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.

2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners have questioned the first information report arising out of Case Crime No. 0024 of 2025, under Sections 351(3), 318(4) and 329 of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Cantt., District Bareilly.

3. Sri Murtaza, learned Senior Advocate submits that as per his information, no charge sheet has been submitted by the police, however, office report dated 27th April 2026 shows as under: "It is most humbly submitted that as per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, chargesheet no. CS- 145/25 has been filed. Therefore, in view of above, the case is put up for order before Hon'ble Court."

4. Since now charge sheet has been filed in the matter after police has concluded the investigation, we consider it appropriate for the petitioners to question the charge sheet in appropriate proceeding before appropriate forum. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raza Abbas, Syed Ali Murtaza Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ankish Tripathi And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

5. In view of the above, we dismiss this petition with aforesaid liberty. May 5, 2026 IrfanUddin CRLP No. 5317 of 2025 2 (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead