Allahabad High Court

WRIC/17473/2026 of RAMCHANDRA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 4 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17473 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "(1) To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 17473 of 2026

Court No. - 36

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "(1) To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the directing the respondent no.2 to decide the Restoration Application filed in Case No. 4636 of 2016 (Computer Case No.T2016126127014636 (Gram Samaj Vs. Dayaram), U/s 67 of U.P. Revenue Code-2006 expeditiously and within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court and further be pleased to direct the respondent no.4 not to interfere in peaceful possession over the land in dispute during pendency of restoration application."

3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that restoration application is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.

May 5, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Ramchandra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead