Allahabad High Court
WRIC/17383/2026 of RAJ NARAYAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 4 May 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17383 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17383 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the Appeal No.C202415000001985 (Vijendra Vs. Up-Ziladhikari, Mehnagar, Azamgarh) under 9 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned appeal is pending consideration since 2024 and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. Since the above-mentioned appeal is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the above-mentioned appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. May 5, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Raj Narayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad