Allahabad High Court
WRIC/15373/2026 of RAJNATH Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 7 OTHERS on 22 April 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 15373 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "( a ) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 26.09.2025 passed by
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 15373 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 26.09.2025 passed by Respondent No.3, Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kerakat, District Jaunpur in Case No. RST/2885/2025, Computerized Case No. T202514360502885 (Bhullan Vs. Gram Sabha & Others) under Section 209 (J) of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2005
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of ad-interim mandamus, commanding and directing the authority concern could not interfere with the peaceful possession in land-in-question and enjoyment of the petitioner in any way."
2. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that order impugned is appealable under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
3. In view of above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under the law.
5. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents annexed with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioner after Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Kamlesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Rajnath .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
retaining photocopy of the same on record. April 23, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIC No. 15373 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad