Allahabad High Court
WRIC/15379/2026 of SMT SANTOSH KUMARI UPADHYAY Vs UP ZILADHIKARI SADAR AND 3 OTHERS on 22 April 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 15379 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " 1) Issue a writ/order or direction in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 15379 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " 1) Issue a writ/order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ghazipur to decide the petitioners' Appliation No. 13922/2025 (Santosh Kumari Upadhyay Vs. Raimuni) for consolidation of the Case No.10/2017 (Computer Case No. T20171429601010) (Santosh Vs. Ramkrit) and Case No.3812/2020 (Computer Case No.T202014291003812) (Raimuni Vs. Ramkrit) since both are mutation cases between same party, same property on the death of Late Ramkrit father of petitioner, and both be tried and decided in one court, within any stipulated time as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in circumstance of the case."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that aforementioned application is pending since 2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ghazipur to consider and decide the Application No. 13922/2025, in accordance with law, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhai Singh, Virendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt Santosh Kumari Upadhyay .....Petitioner(s) Up Ziladhikari Sadar And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
April 23, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIC No. 15379 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad