Allahabad High Court
NA529/1885/2026 of M/S OM BHAWAN NIRMAN SAMAGRI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 19 April 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1885 of 2026 Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed to direct the Additional Civil Judge (Junior
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1885 of 2026 Court No. - 84 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed to direct the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/ Judicial Magistrate, Court No.12, Mathura to decide the Case No. 1028 of 2024 (M/s Om Bhawan Nirman vs. Girdhari Rajput), under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Highway, District Mathrua, expeditiously within a stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the said case is pending since the year 2024 and as per Section 143 (3) of the N.I. Act it should be disposed of within a period of six months from the date of filing of the complaint but more than a year has been passed from the date of filing of the complaint, therefore, the same may be expedited within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court. In view of the provision of Section 143 (3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, court below is expected to make all endeavours to decide the aforesaid complaint case expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties without giving any unnecessary adjournments to either parties, if there is no other legal impediment in deciding the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid observations, the application is finally disposed of. April 20, 2026 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rohit Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) M/S Om Bhawan Nirman Samagri .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad