Allahabad High Court
WRIC/14649/2026 of GOPESHWAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS on 19 April 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 14649 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 14649 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondent no. 2 l.e. Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil-Rudrapur, District- Deoria to decide the case bearing Case no. RST/1174/2025 Computerized Case No.T202505200301174 (Gopeshwar Singh Vs. Indrasani Devi) under section 209(J) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 arising out of mutation case no. 00510 of 2020, computerized case по. Т202005200300510 ( Gopeshwar Singh Vs. Indrasani Devi) under section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending in the court of respondent no. 2, within stipulated period fix by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid restoration application is pending since 2025. It is further contended that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Gopeshwar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. April 20, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIC No. 14649 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad