NA529/975/2025 of GAUTAM VISHWAKARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 19 April 2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. None is present on behalf of the opposite party even in the revised call.

2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for early decision of Criminal Case No.74 of 2025 arising out of Case No. 453 of 2019, under Section- 12 of D.V. Act Police Station- Karanda, District- Ghazipur, pending before the learned Civil Judge (J.D.)/FTC Court No.2, Ghazipur.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that vide order dated 11.03.2026, passed by this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the Court but even after revised call, none is present on behalf of the opposite party no.2. It is further submitted that the restoration application has pending since 2025 and considerable time has already been lapsed.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid application/case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raj Kumar Pandey, Ram Kumar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anil Kumar, G.A., Mukul Yadav, Rajesh Yadav Gautam Vishwakarma .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. April 20, 2026 S.K. NA529 No. 975 of 2025 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad