Allahabad High Court
WRIC/14593/2026 of PAPPU Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 19 April 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 14593 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "issue a writ
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 14593 of 2026
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the interim application dated 04.04.2026 in Appeal No. 112 of 2018 Computer Case No. D202016660002925/112 (Budhiraji Versus Mannuram and others) within a stipulated period of time which may fix by this Hon'ble Court. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may very kindly be please to direct to the parties concern to do not create third. party right till the disposal of the application or Appeal pending before respondent no.2."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid interim application in appeal is pending consideration. It is further contended that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned interim application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rashid Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pappu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. April 20, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIC No. 14593 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad