Allahabad High Court

WRIC/4197/2026 of BRAHMCHARINI DR. REKHA JAIN Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS on 18 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 4197 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State-respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following substantial relief:- "

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 4197 of 2026

Court No. - 4

HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State-respondents.

2. Present petition has been filed seeking following substantial relief:- "A). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 - Chairperson, Uttar Pradesh State Commission for Women to decide the complaint dated 01.09.2025 filed by the Petitioner in an expeditious manner."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representation dated 01.09.2025 before respondent No.2- Chairperson, Uttar Pradesh State Commission for Women, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation within a stipulated time, for which learned standing counsel has no objection.

4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 01.09.2025 in accordance with law maximum within period of eight weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anup Shukla, Devansh Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Brahmcharini Dr. Rekha Jain .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

is upon respondent No.2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. March 19, 2026 Sachin Mishra WRIC No. 4197 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead