Allahabad High Court

WRIC/10478/2026 of ISHWAR CHANDRA AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS on 18 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10478 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- " A ). Issue a

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 10478 of 2026

Court No. - 4

HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for respondents.

2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "A). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding directing and restraining the respondents from demolishing the alleged construction or interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners over the land in dispute being Gata No.70 area 0.047 hectare situated Village Rehar Ward No.10, Bhagat Singh Nayar, Tehsil & District Basti during the pendency of the present writ petition."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed reply before the respondent no.4, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 4 to decide the aforesaid reply within a stipulated time, for which learned standing counsel has no objection.

4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 4 to decide the reply of the petitioner in accordance with law maximum within period of four weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 4 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. March 19, 2026 Junaid Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bashisth Narain Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Ishwar Chandra And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead