Allahabad High Court
A227/3447/2026 of RATI SHUKLA Vs PUNIT KUMAR CHAUBEY on 18 March 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3447 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner does not want press this petition, therefore, the same may be dismissed as not pressed at this stage. 2. Prayer so made
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3447 of 2026
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner does not want press this petition, therefore, the same may be dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
2. Prayer so made is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed at this stage. March 19, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kr Srivastava, Pratibha Asthana Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Rati Shukla .....Petitioner(s) Punit Kumar Chaubey .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad