Allahabad High Court
A227/3476/2026 of VIVEK PARASHAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 18 March 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3476 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following relief:- "i. Command and direct the learned Principal Judge Family Court, Bareilly to hear and decide the divorce petition no.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3476 of 2026
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed for the following relief:- "i. Command and direct the learned Principal Judge Family Court, Bareilly to hear and decide the divorce petition no. 266/2025, "Vivek Parashar vs. Richa Sharma" u/s 13-B Hindu Marriage Act" within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that a petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was filed by the petitioner in the court of Principle Judge (Family Court), Bareilly. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously.
3. On a query being made by this Court, counsel for the petitioner states that no application for waiving the cooling off has been filed by either of parties before the Principle Judge (Family Court), Bareilly.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for waiving off cooling period before Principle Judge (Family Court), Bareilly. In case, such an application is filed, Principle Judge (Family Court), Bareilly will decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two weeks thereafter, considering the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Amardeep Singh vs. Harveen Kaur; (2017) 8 SCC 746 as well as judgment of this Court in Matters Under Article 227 No.1886 of 2020 (Smt. Pratibha v. Gaurav). March 19, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Musharraf Ali, Salman Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Vivek Parashar .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad