Allahabad High Court
A227/3405/2026 of MOHD LAIK AND 2 OTHERS Vs MOHD JAHID on 18 March 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3405 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13.01.2026 passed by the appellate court. Trial court by order dated 18.12.2025 granted an interim injunction in favor of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3405 of 2026
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 13.01.2026 passed by the appellate court. Trial court by order dated 18.12.2025 granted an interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff-petitioners. The defendant-respondent filed an appeal in which the order dated 13.01.2026 was passed staying the operation of interim injunction order granted by the trial court.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that in the garb of interim injunction order, the plaintiff-petitioners started interfering with the possession of the defendant over the property in dispute and therefore, the appellate court has rightly stayed the operation of interim injunction order. It has also been submitted that the appeal is pending consideration before the court below.
3. Since the appeal is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with direction to the appellate court i.e. Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, District- Bareilly to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after hearing all the parties concerned, provided there is no other legal impediment.
5. Till the disposal of the appeal, both the parties are directed to maintain status quo.
March 19, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dileep Kumar Yadav, Yash Padia Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Mishra (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Mohd Laik And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Mohd Jahid .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad