Allahabad High Court
WRIC/5715/2026 of RUKMESH GUPTA AND 23 OTHERS Vs STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS on 18 March 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 5715 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. 2.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 5715 of 2026
Court No. - 4
HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.
2. Present petition has been filed with following relief; "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 11.09.2012 passed by District Magistrate, Shahjahanpur and order dated 24.12.2025 & 19.01.2026 passed by Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad Tilhar, Shahjahanpur."
3. Case was heard on 12.02.2026 and Court has passed the following order; "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents and Sri Umang Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.
2. Sri Umang Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 prays for and is granted one week time to seek instruction as to why premium money in question has yet not been refunded to the petitioners.
3. Put up this case as fresh on 19.2.2026."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he is not pressing the prayer so made, but direction may be issued to refund the amount in question along with interest.
5. Sri Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submitted that respondents are having no objection to refund the premium money in question, but without any interest.
6. Once, it is undisputed that money was deposited by the petitioners and further, entitled for refund, there is no reason not to pay the interest. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Pandey, Ved Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Harsh Vardhan Gupta Rukmesh Gupta And 23 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Under such facts of the case, writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 3- Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad Tilhar, Shahjahanpur to refund the entire amount so deposited by the petitioners along with interest applicable on the saving account of Nationalized Bank within eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. March 19, 2026 Arvind WRIC No. 5715 of 2026 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad