Allahabad High Court

A227/3463/2026 of VINOD KUMAR ALIAS PAPPU Vs SHIV SHANKAR AND 11 OTHERS on 18 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3463 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " a ) Issue a direction, directing the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3463 of 2026

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " a) Issue a direction, directing the district judiciary to decide the Misc Case No. 99 of 2024 (Vinod Kumar Vs Shiv Shankar) (Under Order 9 Rule 13 of C.P.C) pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (S.D) Ist District Jaunpur expeditiously within stipulated time as fix by this Hon'ble court."

3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that aforesaid case is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (S.D) Ist District Jaunpur to consider and decide the Misc Case No. 99 of 2024, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.

March 19, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiva Priya Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) :

(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Vinod Kumar Alias Pappu .....Petitioner(s) Shiv Shankar And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead