Allahabad High Court

WRIC/10261/2026 of SANT KUMAR YADAV AND 2 OTHERS Vs PRESIDING OFFICER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNAL AND 2 OTHERS on 17 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10261 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- ".Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 10261 of 2026

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- ".Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Learned Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (South), Kanpur Nagar to decide the M.A.C.P Case no. 136 of 2021 (Sant Kumar Yadav and Ors versus R.M UPSRTC and Others) pending before him within the time specified by this Hon'ble Court."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned case is pending consideration since 2021, the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

4. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (South), Kanpur Nagar to decide the above-mentioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. March 18, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshi Srivastava, Shreesh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) :

(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sant Kumar Yadav And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead