Allahabad High Court
A227/3409/2026 of SMT. RAMWATI Vs SHASHIKANT KUMAR MATHUR AND 3 OTHERS on 17 March 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3409 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Tanmay Agrawal, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 and perused the record. 2. Vakalatnama filed today by Shri Dheeraj Kumar
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3409 of 2026
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Tanmay Agrawal, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 and perused the record.
2. Vakalatnama filed today by Shri Dheeraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.1 is taken on record.
3. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 19.2.2026 passed by the District Judge, Etah. Appeal was filed by the defendant-respondent against an order of injunction passed by the Trial Court on 13.1.2026. In the appeal, an application was moved for adjournment by the petitioner on the ground that talks of compromise are going on and, therefore, the case may be adjourned. On the said application 19.2.2026 and operation of order dated 3.1.2026 passed by the Trial Court has been stayed.
4. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the Court below have erroneously stayed the injunction order passed by the Trial Court without considering merits of the appeal. It has also been submitted that after this order, respondents have resiled from any compromise. The order of status quo cannot be stayed on the ground that there are chances of compromise between the parties.
5. Accordingly, the order dated 19.2.2026 passed by the District Judge, Etah, is hereby set aside to the extent staying the order passed on the interim injunction application passed by the Trial Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Navin Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashok Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar Pandey, Tanmay Agrawal Smt. Ramwati .....Petitioner(s) Shashikant Kumar Mathur And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
The District Judge, Etah is directed to consider and decide the.application for interim relief, if any, filed in the appeal as well as the appeal, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. March 18, 2026 Rishabh A227 No. 3409 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad