Allahabad High Court
WRIC/45843/2025 of SMT. SWATI CHADHA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 17 March 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 45843 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mohd. Afzal, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and learned standing counsel for State- respondents. 2. Present petition has
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 45843 of 2025
Court No. - 4
HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mohd. Afzal, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and learned standing counsel for State- respondents.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Real Estate Regularity Bench No. 3 Gautam Buddha Nagar Respondent No.3 to decide and dispose of the application dated 09.12.2025 of the petitioners for compliance of the order dated 14.11.2025 and application dated 10.12.2025 for fixing the earliest possible dated instead of 27.02.2026 in Complaint No. NCR145/09/132894/2025 for disposal of their complaint case within the shortest period of time without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties."
3. Mohd. Afzal, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submits that there is only provision to file application through online mode. But in the present petition, the petitioner has filed offline complaint. Therefore, the same cannot be considered.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have also filed an online application dated 12.12.2025 for compliance of order dated 14.11.2025. Therefore, direction may be issued to respondent No.3 to decide the representation within a stipulated time.
5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 3 to decide the online application of the petitioner dated 12.12.2025 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Utpal Chatterji Counsel for Respondent(s) : Mohd. Afzal, C.S.C. Smt. Swati Chadha And Another .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s)
6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No.3 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case.
March 18, 2026 Sachin Mishra WRIC No. 45843 of 2025 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad