Allahabad High Court
A227/3415/2026 of GULAM AND 7 OTHERS Vs KEDARNATH on 17 March 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3415 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "To Direct the learned Trial Court to decide
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3415 of 2026
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "To Direct the learned Trial Court to decide the Application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC pending in original suit No. 1658 of 2022 (Kadharnath Vs Gulam) pending before the Court of Civil Judge (J.D) Court No. 31 Azamgarh, expeditously peraferably within stipulated period."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned application is pending consideration since 2022 and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. Since the above-mentioned application is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) Court No. 31 Azamgarh to decide the above-mentioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. March 18, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Vivek Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Gulam And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) Kedarnath .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad