Allahabad High Court

WRIA/7480/2018 of SMT. SHYAM LATA SRIVASTAVA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU M.D. MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT NIGAM LTD. and ORS. on 29 September 2026

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 7480 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 7480 of 2018

Court No. - 18

HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

1. Case called out.

2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Pandey, Mohd.Areeb Siddiqui, Sachin Tejashwi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ved Prakash Shukla, Manish Jauhari (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Shyam Lata Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru M.D. Madhyanchal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead