Allahabad High Court

CAPL/1641/2025 of SUPRIYA PATEL AND 3 OTHERS Vs RAJ KUMAR PANDIT, DISTT. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS, JALAUN AND OTHERS on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41033 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1641 of 2025 Applicant :- Supriya Patel And 3 Others Opposite Party :- Raj Kumar Pandit, Distt. Inspector Of Schools, Jalaun And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41033

Court No. - 17

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1641 of 2025

Applicant :- Supriya Patel And 3 Others

Opposite Party :- Raj Kumar Pandit, Distt. Inspector Of Schools, Jalaun And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Standing Counsel for State.

2. The present contempt application has been filed for the alleged non-compliance of order dated 29.05.2019 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No.15686 of 2019 (S/S) (Ashok Kumar Pandey & 12 others Vs. State of U.P. and others).

3. Sri Sunil Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, has filed before this Court affidavit of compliance duly sworn by Sri Raj Kumar Pandit, District Inspector of Schools, Jalaun, which is taken on record. He submits that pursuant to the direction issued by writ court, decision has already been taken by the respondent vide order dated 27.07.2019 and further representation of the applicant has also been decided on 11.07.2025. The copy of the orders dated 27.07.2019 as also 11.07.2025 have been annexed along with the compliance affidavit as Annexure Nos. CA-1 and 2. He therefore submits that the order of the writ Court has been complied with by the respondent authority.

4. Considering the contents of the order of writ Court as well as the contents of the compliance affidavit, this Court is of the view that since the order of the writ Court has been complied with by the respondent authority therefore, the present contempt application has lost its efficacy.

5. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed. Order Date :- 17.7.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead