Allahabad High Court

A482/4642/2016 of HASEENA BANO Vs STATE OF U.P. and ANR. on 3 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4642 of 2016 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Case has been called in the revised list. 2. Neither the learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioner is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4642 of 2016

Court No. - 17

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Case has been called in the revised list.

2. Neither the learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioner is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.

3. The application is dismissed in default. August 26, 2025 S. Kumar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Om Prakash Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Manish Kumar,J.) Haseena Bano .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead