Allahabad High Court
WRIC/1002987/1999 of JAGDISH PRASAD Vs ADDL.COMMISSIONER ADMN. FAIZABAD AND OTHERS on 10 April 2026
No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:29396 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1002987 of 1999 Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad Respondent :- Addl.Commissioner Admn. Faizabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- N.N.Jaiswal,Awadhesh Kumar Mishra,Mamta Singh,N N Jaiswal,Prashant Jaiswal,Rajesh Pandey Counsel for
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:29396
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1002987 of 1999
Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad
Respondent :- Addl.Commissioner Admn. Faizabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- N.N.Jaiswal,Awadhesh Kumar Mishra,Mamta Singh,N N Jaiswal,Prashant Jaiswal,Rajesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Chief Standing Counsel,S.P.Tripathi,Vijay Kumar Bajapai Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The matter has been taken up on urgency being mentioned by respondent counsel for the respondents.
2. This Court on 04.04.2024 has passed following order :- "1. Smt. Deepika Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Prashant Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for adjournment.
2. It is noticed that on previous occasion also the matter was adjourned at the behest of petitioner. Assurance has been given on behalf of petitioner that no such adjournment shall be sought on the next date of listing.
3. Accordingly, list this case on 10.04.2024, in top ten cases. It is made clear that no adjournment will be granted at the behest of petitioner on the next date of listing."
3. Today also when the case has been taken up,no one has appeared on behalf of petitioner. Sri V.K. Bajpai, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 to 7 is present.
4. Considering non appearance on behalf of petitioner, it seems that petitioner has lost interest in the matter and does not want to pursue the matter.
5. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 10.4.2024 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench