Allahabad High Court
TACR/22/2023 of NEETI VERMA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND ANOTHER on 25 March 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 22 of 2023 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant to press this application. However, learned counsel representing side opposite
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 22 of 2023
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant to press this application. However, learned counsel representing side opposite is present in the Court.
2. It appears that the applicant and the counsel engaged by the applicant both have lost the interest in the case and are not interested in pursuing the application.
3. It would be appropriate to refer two maxims:-
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end). The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to their help and there should be end to litigation.
4. Considering the aforesaid, this Court feels that the application should not be disposed of on merits and should be dismissed for non-prosecution. Accordingly, it is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 29, 2025 Vinay/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Krishan Kanhaya Pal, Krishan Kanhaya Pal, Pooja Pal, Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, Shekhar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Prabhat Shukla, Raj Narain, Raj Narain Pandey (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Neeti Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench