Allahabad High Court
HABC/31069/2021 of MASTER DHRITIL BHARGAVA THRU. HIS FATHER ABHINAVA BHARAGAVA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LUCKNOW and ANR. on 18 February 2026
No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18887 Court No. - 11 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 31069 of 2021 Petitioner :- Master Dhritil Bhargava Thru. His Father Abhinava Bharagava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Padm Kirti,Aasif Razzaque
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18887 Court No. - 11 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 31069 of 2021 Petitioner :- Master Dhritil Bhargava Thru. His Father Abhinava Bharagava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Padm Kirti,Aasif Razzaque Khan,Abdul Razzaque Khan,Abhay Nath Mishra,Divya Mishra,Gaurav Singh,Rajeev Shukla,Sanjeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Nandita Bharti Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. List is being revised. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition, whereas learned A.G.A. and Ms.Nandita Bharti, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 are present. The following order was passed on 03.01.2025:- "1. No one is present for the petitioner while the name of eight counsels is printed in the cause list, while Ms. Nandita Bharti is present for respondent no.2 along with learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant petition is being listed after a long period of time.
3. Thus, a last opportunity is provided to learned counsels for the petitioner to participate in the proceedings, failing which, the petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution if no one would appear on behalf of the petitioner on the next date of listing.
4. List this case, accordingly, on 27.01.2025. " In view of above it appears that the petitioner does not want to press this petition. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 also informed that no rejoinder affidavit has been filed by the petitioner. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. . .................. .......................................(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 4.4.2025 Banswar Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench