Allahabad High Court
NA528/2178/2025 of IRFAN ALI @ IRFAN AND 10 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 5 January 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2178 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Case
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2178 of 2025
Court No. - 16
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Case No.29084 of 2025, arising out of FIR No.219 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 333, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 125, 10, 324(4), 118(1) and 117(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Risiya, District Bahraich, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Bahraich.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merits. However, he submits that applicants will surrender before the trial court and apply for bail. He prays that the applicant may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386).
4. It is, therefore, directed that in case the applicants surrender before the Court below within three weeks from today and prefer bail application, the trial court will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Irfan Ali @ Irfan And 10 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
5. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
6. The application stands disposed of. January 5, 2026 Rao/- NA528 No. 2178 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench