Allahabad High Court
A482/10194/2025 of MITHUN @ ANUJ JAISWAL AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LUCKNOW AND 2 OTHERS on 5 January 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10194 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Jag Jewan Prasad, learned counsel, who has filed power on behalf of opposite
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10194 of 2025
Court No. - 16
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Jag Jewan Prasad, learned counsel, who has filed power on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3, which is taken on record.
2. On the oral prayer of counsel for the applicants, he is permitted to amend the prayer clause during the course of the day.
3. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.146078 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No.0198 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC, Police Station Thakurganj, District Lucknow, pending in the court of Additional District Judge, Room No.12, Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and the original compromise deed dated 17.11.2025 filed as Annexure-3 to the application, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned.
6. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of with a direction to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Mishra, Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mithun @ Anuj Jaiswal And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
both the parties to appear before the court concerned on 15.01.2026 and file their comprise application. If such compromise application is filed, the court concerned shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within six weeks from that date. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court making compromise to be part of the record and a report to that effect shall also be send to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not. The court concerned will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise. It will also be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
7. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
8. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the applicant(s) after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. January 5, 2026 Rao/- A482 No. 10194 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench