Central Government Industrial Tribunal
Smt. Geeta Devi vs M.C.D on 11 February 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM – LABOUR COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI ID No.128/2021 Ms. Geeta Devi (LR of Late Sh. Lekhram) vs. E.D.M.C.
Ms. Geeta Devi, (legal heir of the claimant Sh. Lekhram), S/o Sh. Bhoop Singh, Through- The General Secretary, Municipal Employees Union, Aggarwal Bhawan, G.T. Road, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110054.
…Applicant/Claimant
Versus The Commissioner, East Delhi Municipal Corporation, Plot No. 419, Udhyog Sadan, Patparganj Industrial Area, Delhi-110092.
…Management/respondent
Counsels: For Applicant/ Claimant: Ms. S. Dey, Ld. AR.
For Management/ Respondent: Sh. Rajiv Bhardwaj and Ms. Nazia Mohammad, Ld. AR.
Item No.- 32
I.D. No. 128/2021 11th February 2025 Present: Ms. S. Dey, Ld. AR for the claimant. Ms. Nazia Mohammad, Ld. AR for the management.
AR for the claimant submits that the reference be disposed of in terms of Para-3 of the written statement filed by the management where the management submitted that it has made necessary corrections in the service book of the claimant.
Record speaks that a reference in regard to the claim had been made to this tribunal by the appropriate government in the following words:
Whether the worker Sh. Lekhram S/o Sh. Bhoop Singh, working as ‘painter’ with the management of EDMC is entitled for corrections in his ECR record that he was not on medical leave from 16.09.2018 to 05.10.2018, as raised through Municipal Employees’ Union vide letter dated 07.11.2019, and if yes, what directions are necessary in this regard?
The claimant claims that he has been continuously discharging his services with the management since 20.12.1984. As per the ECR record pertaining to the claimant concerned, he has been shown on medical leave during the period from 16.09.2018 to 05.10.2018 which he was not. He further submits that despite issuing the demand notice, no action has been taken in this regard.
Subsequently, the management appeared and filed its W.S. submitting that corrections have been made in the service book of the respondent. As such, nothing remains outstanding. The benefit of leave encashment of Rs. 6,45,880/- for 300 days has already been given to the claimant.
In view of the above reply of the management and submission of Ld. AR for the claimant, this reference is answered accordingly in terms of Para 3 of written statement wherein the management has acceded the demand of the claimant and made necessary corrections in the service book of the claimant. A copy of this award is sent to the appropriate government for notification, as required under section 17 of the ID act 1947. The file is consigned to record room.
ATUL KUMAR GARG
Dated 11.02.2025
Presiding Officer
CGIT – cum – Labour Court – II