Central Government Industrial Tribunal

Sh. Kallu vs National Zoological Park & Anr on 2 December 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM- LABOUR COURT NO-II, NEW DELHI

ID.No. 59/2023

Sh. Kallu, S/o Sh. Raghuvir Singh,

R/o-D-48, Mavi Mohalla, Village Tehkhand, Okhla Phase-I, New Delhi-110020.

VERSUS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Director, National Zoological Park, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110003.

2. The Director, Mahavir & Brothers, 14-B/47, Dev Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005.

Appearance For claimants: None. For respondent: None.

AWARD

This is an application U/S 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act (here in after referred as an Act) filed by the claimant for his illegal termination. Claim of the claimant is that he was working with the management since 01.02.2021 at the post of Safai Karamchari at the last drawn salary of Rs. 15,908/- p.m. He has been doing his duty with diligently and honestly and did not give any chance to the management for any complaint. During the services, management had not been providing any legal facilities i.e. appointment letter, Leave Book, overtime, I-card, Salary receipt, Attendance sheet etc. When the workman demanded the aforesaid legal facilities, management got annoyed with the demands raised by the claimant and had terminated the services of the workman on 05.03.2022 without any rhyme or reason or without issuing any show- cause notice and without paying the wages of the months i.e. 01.11.2021 to 04.03.2022 (totally Rs. 66076/-) which is an abolition of Section 25 F of the Act. He has sent the demand letter through union, but, neither he has been taken on duty nor has been paid the wages of months by the management i.e. 01.11.2021 to 04.03.2022. He had sent the complaint to the labour commissioner, but, it has yielded no result. Hence, He has filed the present claim. Neither the management nor the workman has been appearing since long. Notice was issued to them but, they have not appeared. In these circumstances, when the claimant is not interested in pursuing his claim, this tribunal has no option except to pass the no disputant award. Hence, no disputant award is passed. Award is passed accordingly. File is consigned to the record room. A copy of this award is sent to the appropriate government for notification under section 17 of the I.D Act 1947.

ATUL KUMAR GARG Date: 02.12.2024

Presiding Officer.

CGIT-cum-Labour Court-II

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead