Securities Appellate Tribunal

M/s. Robinhood Insurance Broker Limited vs Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

AT MUMBAI

Dated this the 25th day of September, 2026

CORAM : Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup, Technical Member Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar, Technical Member IRDAI Appeal No. 006 of 2026

[Along with Misc. Application No. 11 of 2026]

BETWEEN:

M/s. Robinhood Insurance Broker Limited

501-504, Sigma, Technology Street,

Hiranandani Business Park,

Powai, Mumbai – 400 076.

….. Appellant

(By Mr. Mustafa Doctor, Senior Advocate with Ms. Maithili Parikh, Mr. Naval Sharma, Mr. Anubhav Dutta, Mr. Nabeel Malik and Ms. Mansi Tyagi, Advocates i/b Tuli & Co. for the Appellant)

AND:

Insurance

Regulatory

and

Development

Authority of India

Head Office:

Sy No. 115/1, Financial District,

Nanakramguda, Gachibowli,

Hyderabad – 500 032.

…Respondent

(By

Mr.

Mihir

Mody

with

Mr.

Aavish

Shetty,

Mr. Sudhanshuman Naruka, Mr. Vijay Chockalingam and Mr. Vignesh Narayanan, Advocates i/b. M/s. K Ashar & Co.

for the Respondent-IRDAI)

THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 110(1) OF THE

INSURANCE ACT, 1938 TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE

COMMUNICATION DATED JULY 15, 2026 ISSUED BY THE

CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (INTERMEDIARIES), INSURANCE

REGULATORY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF INDIA

(IRDAI).

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE

TRIBUNAL MADE THE FOLLOWING:

2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Per: Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar, Presiding Officer (Oral)

Mr. Mustafa Doctor, learned Senior Advocate for the appellant submitted that the impugned communication dated July 15, 2026 has been issued by the respondent without granting an opportunity of hearing.

2. On instructions, Mr. Mihir Mody, learned Advocate for the respondent submitted that the appellant shall be granted an opportunity of hearing. His submission is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the impugned communication issued by the respondent dated July 15, 2026 is set aside. The respondent shall grant an opportunity of hearing to the appellant and pass a fresh communication in accordance with law.

4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of. No costs.

Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar

Presiding Officer

Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member

Dr. Dheeraj Bhatnagar Technical Member 25.09.2026 msb MADHUKAR BHALBAR Digitally signed by MADHUKAR BHALBAR Date: 2026.09.29 15:02:47 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead