Allahabad High Court
WRIC/12256/2025 of SMT. LAXMI DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF FOOD AND SUPPLY LKO AND 5 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12256 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Prem Chandra Chauhan, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Surendra Kumar Singh, the learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of the instant petition, the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12256 of 2025
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Prem Chandra Chauhan, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Surendra Kumar Singh, the learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the District Magistrate, Sitapur to take suitable action on the petitioner's representation dated 29.11.2025 regarding certain illegality committed in selection of fair price shop dealer of Village Panchayat- Kurar, Block- Pahla, Tehsil-Mahmoodabad, Sitapur.
3. On the basis of written instructions provided by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mahmoodabad, Sitapur, the learned Standing Counsel has informed the Court has informed the Court that on 12.12.2025, the SDM has directed the Block Development Officer to submit a report in the matter. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that immediately upon receipt of the report, suitable action will be taken in accordance with law.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off keeping in view the aforesaid written instructions by providing that a suitable action will be taken upon the representation of the petitioner expeditiously.
5. In case the petitioner has any reason to be aggrieved in future, he will have the liberty to file a fresh petition. December 19, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Chandra Chauhan, Kashi Ram Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Smt. Laxmi Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Food And Supply Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench