Allahabad High Court

BAIL/12774/2025 of UGRASEN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12774 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.613 of 2024 under section 108 BNS,

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12774 of 2025

Court No. - 12

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.613 of 2024 under section 108 BNS, P.S. Mohammadpur Khala, District Barabanki.

3. It is argued that the co-accused has been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 10.11.2025 passed in Bail Application No.10804 of 2025.

4. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in para 3 & 5 of the said order, the applicant who has no criminal history and is in custody since 01.11.2025 is entitled to bail on the same reasoning. Thus the bail application is allowed.

5. Let the applicant Ugrasen be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ugrasen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)

or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 12774 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead