Allahabad High Court

BAIL/12752/2025 of RAJESH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12752 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.528 of 2022, under Section 302 IPC

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12752 of 2025

Court No. - 12

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.528 of 2022, under Section 302 IPC & Section 4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Kheri, District Kheri.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was enlarged on bail vide order dated 07.11.2025 under Sections 498A, 304 IPC & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act. Subsequently, the charge was altered and Section 302 IPC was added apart from Section 4 of D.P. Act for which the present bail application has been filed.

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

5. Considering the fact that the applicant was enlarged on bail on 07.11.2025 and he has not misused the said liberty, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the newly added section also. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

6. Let the applicant Rajesh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheerendra Kr. Agnihotri Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12752 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead