Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11972/2025 of MOHAMMAD ASLAM Vs UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY EXTERNAL AFFAIRS NEW DELHI AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11972 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.B. Pandey, learned D.S.G.I. assisted by Shri Varun Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11972 of 2025
Court No. - 3
HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.B. Pandey, learned D.S.G.I. assisted by Shri Varun Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following main relief(s): "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the opposite party No. 2 / The Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow to process and renew the petitioner's passport No. N1169015 Type-P dated 09.07.2015 and further prayed that the opposite party No. 2 may kindly be restrained from withholding or refusing the renewal of the petitioner's passport only on the ground that Case Crime No. 267 of 2018 is pending, especially when no court has passed any order prohibiting the petitioner from obtaining or renewing his passport under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act, 1967."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter may be disposed of in light of the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar versus Union of India and 2 others; Writ-C No.41540 of 2023 : Neutral Citation No.-2024:AHC:9963-DB.
4. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is controverted by Shri S.B. Pandey, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of the respondent(s). His submission is that the judgment of Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (supra) has been modified by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rita Verma vs. Union of India and others; Petition(s) Special Leave to Appeal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachin Tiwari, Ajay Sharma, Manisha Devi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Mohammad Aslam .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry External Affairs New Delhi And Another .....Respondent(s)
(C) No.7481 of 2024 vide judgment and order dated 20.09.2024.
5. It may be noted that in Smt. Rita Verma vs. Union of India and others; Writ-C No.6450 of 2024; Neutral Citation No.2024:AHC:35201-DB, the Division Bench of this Court had reiterated the ratio of Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (supra). However, after examining the entire position with regard to the Memorandum No.VI/401/1/5/2019 dated 10.10.2019, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rita Verma (supra) has directed as follows:- "4. In spite of the clear wordings in the Memo, the High Court by the order impugned herein came to a conclusion that the office Memorandum is contrary to the statutory position and proceeded to dismiss the Writ Petition.
5. We have heard Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, appearing for the appellant as also Mr. K.M. Natraj, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India. Mr. K.M. Natraj, learned Additional Solicitor General submits that the approach adopted by the High Court that the Office Memorandum is contrary to the statutory positions and is not supported by law and it is also not the stand of the Union of India. Learned Additional Solicitor General expressed no difficulty in processing the application of the appellant on the basis of the Office Memorandum.
6. In this view of the matter, it is sufficient for us to direct the authorities to consider the application for renewal of the passport on the basis of Office Memorandum dated 10.10.2019 or any other subsequent Office Memorandums that may govern the field notwithstanding the order passed by the High Court in Writ Petition(C) No.6450/2024 dated 28.02.2024, upon making of an appropriate application, the same shall be disposed of, as expeditiously as possible."
6. In light of the above finding(s) of Hon'ble Supreme Court, we are of the view that the authorities are required to consider the application of the petitioner for issuance of fresh passport on the basis of Office Memorandum dated 10.10.2019 or any other subsequent office memorandum that may govern the field as the Hon'ble Supreme Court has finally dealt with this issue in Rita Verma (supra). The law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rita Verma (supra) shall apply in the present case, therefore, we direct the authorities to act expeditiously in accordance with law in the subject matter.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 19, 2025 Lokesh Kumar WRIC No. 11972 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench