Allahabad High Court
A482/10700/2025 of VINDE GUPTA @ VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10700 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Saurabh Kumar, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10700 of 2025
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Saurabh Kumar, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Sessions Trial No.204 of 2024; (State vs. Virendra Kumar) arising out of case crime no.94 of 2006, under section 306 IPC., Police Station Kotwali Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar, pending in the court of District and Sessions Judge, Ambedkar Nagar as well as charge sheet no. 47 of 2006 dated 15.5.2006 in the light of compromise held between the parties
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.3 to the application.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava, Himanshu Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinde Gupta @ Virendra Kumar Gupta .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 19, 2025 Pks A482 No. 10700 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench