Allahabad High Court

BAIL/12730/2025 of MAHENDRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12730 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0363 of 2025, under Section 69 BNS

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12730 of 2025

Court No. - 12

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0363 of 2025, under Section 69 BNS & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Sandhana, District Sitapur.

3. In terms of the FIR registered through an application under Section 173(4) BNSS victim aged about 25 years stated that she met with the applicant and on false pretext of marriage, physical relations were formed in between them and subsequently, the marriage was refused on account of non payment of dowry. Age of the victim is around 25 years. The applicant is aged about 21 years.

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

5. Considering the fact that the relationship lasted over a span of one year and considering the age of the applicant, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

6. Let the applicant Mahendra be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prashant Kumar Singh, Apoorv Dev Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mahendra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12730 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead