Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12632/2025 of NANKE @ SUJEET SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12632 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.229 of 2025, under
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12632 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.229 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Pratapgarh.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on the same allegation, the mother-in-law has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 28.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.10113 of 2025. The applicant is the husband.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering and adopting the same reasoning as contained in paras 3 and 5 of the order dated 28.10.2025 coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 30.05.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Nanke @ Sujeet Singh be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nanke @ Sujeet Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12632 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench