Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14936/2025 of SANJAY ASTHANA Vs STATE OF U.P. SECY. MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPTT. LUCKNOW, AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14936 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "i. Issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14936 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to promote the petitioner on the post of Chief Administrative Officer having a Pay Band-3, Rs. 15,600 - 39,100 Grade Pay Rs-5400 and also grant the notional promotion along with arrears of salary for the post of Administrative Officer in Pay Band-3i.e. Rs. 9300 - 34,800 Grade Pay Rs-4200, Senior Administrative Officer Pay Band-3 in Rs.9300 - 34,800 Grade Pay Rs-4800 respectively from the date when the petitioner became eligible for promotion in terms of rule 7(2) to rule 7 (6) of The Uttar Pradesh Government Department Clerical Cadre Service Rules, 2014."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Narain Srivastava, Chitrangada Narayan, Shailendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Sanjay Asthana .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Secy. Medical Health And Family Welfare Deptt. Lucknow, And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench