Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12738/2025 of RAVI @ VIKAS YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12738 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.265 of 2025, under Sections 70(2),
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12738 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.265 of 2025, under Sections 70(2), 351(3) BNS, Section 5(G)(L)/6 of POCSO Act & Section 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Mitauli, District Kheri.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co-accused with similar allegation have been enlarged on bail vide separate orders dated 28.11.2025 & 12.11.2025.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the nature of the allegations to be similar to the co-accused who have been enlarged on bail and adopting the reasoning as contained in Para 5 of the order dated 28.11.2025, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ravi @ Vikas Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi @ Vikas Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12738 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench