Allahabad High Court

BAIL/12589/2025 of AISH MOHAMMAD @ AISHU Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12589 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 553 of 2025, under sections 87, 69

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12589 of 2025

Court No. - 12

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 553 of 2025, under sections 87, 69 BNS, P.S. Safdarganj, District Barabanki.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant aged about 20 years was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently in her statement under Section 180 BNSS the victim did not support the prosecution story. In her statement under Section 183 BNSS she stated that on false pretext of marriage physical relations were formed.

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

5. Considering the age of the victim and the huge variance in two statements, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 22.11.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

6. Let the applicant Aish Mohammad @ Aishu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Prakash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aish Mohammad @ Aishu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12589 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead