Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15215/2025 of NIRMAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF TECHNICAL EDU. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15215 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "(1) A writ order or direction in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 15215 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "(1) A writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to provide the benefits of the judgment dated 04.11.2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court in the case of writ-A No.731 of 2024, Jai Ram Sharma vs. State of U.P. in favour of the Petitioner. (II) A writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to count the period of service rendered by the petitioner as daily wager/sweeper in Govt.Polytechnic, Bahraich for calculating qualifying service for pensionary benefits and also grant said pensionary benefits to the petitioner. (III) A writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to sanction and pay all the post retiral benefit admissible to regular employee after counting the past work charge services rendered by the petitioner along with arrears thereof."
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director, Technical Education, Kanpur or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided in light of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Jai Ram Sharma (supra) in case the same is applicable, within a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayankar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Nirmal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Technical Edu. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 15215 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench