Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14865/2025 of DR. DALJEET SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14865 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14865 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.

2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the State Government (opposite party No.1) to sanction and release pension and post retiral benefits such as, gratuity, GPF, group insurance, earned leave of the petitioner, forthwith in accordance to the provisions as contained under the U.P. Fundamental Rule-56 (e) of the Financial Hand Book Vol. II (Parts-II to IV).

ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.1 to treat the petitioner as voluntarily retired in accordance to provisions as contained under the U.P. Fundamental Rule-56 (c) & (d) of the Financial Hand Book Vol. II (Parts- II to IV). "

3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1, i.e. Principal Secretary, Department of Medical & Health U.P., Lucknow or any other competent authority. In Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ghaus Beg Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dr. Daljeet Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Medical And Health Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.

4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition stands finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 14865 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead