Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15022/2025 of KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. FISHERIES DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15022 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 1A. Learned counsel for petitioner is granted liberty to amend the prayer clause during the course of day.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 15022 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 1A. Learned counsel for petitioner is granted liberty to amend the prayer clause during the course of day.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of post retiral dues including amount of gratuity, GIS, and remaining amount of Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) including Employer Contribution amount Leave Encashment etc. along with interest to the petitioner forthwith.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to give benefit of 3rd ACP to the petitioner along with all consequential benefit of services and also make payment of difference Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Akshat Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Krishna Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Fisheries Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
of salary along with interest to the petitioner, forthwith"
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before concerned authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 15022 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench