Allahabad High Court

BAIL/12638/2025 of RAJA MAN SINGH @ MAN SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12638 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 3. The applicant

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12638 of 2025

Court No. - 12

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.549 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 318(4), 310(2), 317(2), 317(3), 111

(2) (B) of BNS, Police Station Poorakalandar, District Ayodhya.

4. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on the same allegation, the co-accused Vivek Pratap Singh Yadav has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 05.12.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11962 of 2025. The applicant has criminal history of 32 cases, which has been duly explained through supplementary affidavit filed today.

5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

6. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who has been enlarged on bail and adopting the same reasoning contained in the order dated 05.12.2025 coupled with the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 06.08.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vaibhav Srivastava, Vishnu Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raja Man Singh @ Man Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)

7. Let the applicant Raja Man Singh @ Man Singh be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12638 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead