Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14938/2025 of PREM NARAYAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. OF FOREST DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14938 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14938 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to take decision for payment of minimum pay scale to the petitioner in pursuance of order dated 19/09/2025 passed by this Hon'ble court contained as Annexure No.4 to this writ petition.
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay minimum pay scale to the petitioner Rs.18000/- per month on the basis of Government order dated 24-09-2024 which is contained as Annexure No.3 to the writ petition."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Sabha Shanker Dube v. Divisional Forest Officer and others [2019 (37) LCD 319], in case same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nand Kishore Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Prem Narayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Of Forest Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench