Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12733/2025 of DURGA PRASAD YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12733 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.314 of 2025, under Sections 137(2),
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12733 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.314 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)M, 65(1) BNS & Section 5L/6 of POCSO Act, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Balrampur.
3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in her statement under Section 180 BNSS victim stated that she was talking to the applicant for the last one month and the same was resisted by family members and thereafter, she went alongwith the applicant. Victim refused to undergo medical examination.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the aforesaid statement of the victim, the applicant who is in custody since 05.09.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Durga Prasad Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd.Mateen, Vinay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Durga Prasad Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12733 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench