Allahabad High Court
A482/10789/2025 of RENU KORI @ RENU Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10789 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Harsh Pratap Singh, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10789 of 2025
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Harsh Pratap Singh, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2.
3. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 22.03.2020 as well as summoning order dated 25.09.2020 and entire proceedings of F.I.R. No. 88 of 2020, under Sections 427, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submit that in pursuance of the earlier order dated 05.12.2023 passed in Application u/s 482 No. 10067 of 2025, the matter was sent before the court below for verification of the compromise deed.
5. It is evident from the record that the factum of the compromise has been verified by the court below vide his report dated 12.12.2025. The compromise deed is appended as Annexure 5 to the application, which goes to show that respondent no. 2 does not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajeet Kumar Singh, Vishal Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Renu Kori @ Renu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
want to prosecute the applicant.
6. Learned A.G.A. fairly concedes that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court below.
7. Hon'ble Apex Court, in catena of decisions, viz., Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties.
8. In view of the aforesaid fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further and the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter any further.
9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed.
10. charge sheet dated 22.03.2020 as well as summoning order dated 25.09.2020 and entire proceedings of F.I.R. No. 88 of 2020, under Sections 427, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow are hereby quashed.
11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned, forthwith. December 19, 2025 VKS A482 No. 10789 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench