Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12630/2025 of KRISHNA KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12630 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Praveen Kumar Yadav, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. The Vakalatnama is
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12630 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Praveen Kumar Yadav, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.287 of 2025, under Sections 87, 70(1) of BNS, Police Station Dargah Shareef, District Bahraich.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the co-accused Vijay Kumar has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 08.12.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12282 of 2025. He further argues that in respect of the applicant, it was stated that on the false pretext of marriage, physical relations were formed for the last two years. The tentative age of the victim is around 19 years.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the relationship lasted over a span of two years and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 11.10.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .
6. Let the applicant Krishna Kumar be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Krishna Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12630 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench