Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14849/2025 of ANIL KUMAR DWIVEDI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14849 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14849 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "1.Issue Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.3 to reinstate/continue the petitioner in the office of the opposite party no.3/DIOS Shravasti-the place of post where the petitioner was originally appointed as Class IV employee along with regular monthly salary and other consequential benefits, expeditiously, within a specified time." "Issue Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.3 to release salary of the petitioner from the month of January, 2015 to September 2022, along with interest and other applicable allowances/consequential benefits for which the petitioner is eligible, expeditiously, within a specified time. " Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sonu Shukla, Sharda Mohan Tiwari, Vaibhav Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anil Kumar Dwivedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition stands finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 14849 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench